MIS500_Assessment 1_brief_Research Report_Modul

MIS500_Duty 1_brief_Lore Repute_Module 2.2 Page 1 of 5
Undertaking Summary
This duty undertaking requires you to lore and transcribe a 1000 articulation repute on ONE of the subject-matters
provided. These subject-matters are akin to the explanation information systems concepts and technologies
evident in the composition of coeval businesses and organisations.
Context
The point of this ordinance is to amplify your power to discern the correction of information
systems technologies and concepts such as newfangledness, digital separation, cultural contact and new
business models in the coeval laborplace.
Undertaking Instructions
1. Please decipher the solid MIS500_Duty 1_List of Subject-matters.
2. Choose ONE (1) of the three (3) subject-matters.
3. Decipher and lore widely on the separated subject-matter area.
4. Transcribe a 1000 articulation lore repute on the separated subject-matter established on the re-examination of bearing
literature and examples.
5. The repute should embrace an commencement, association and quittance with pointences to support
the ideas.
6. Please point to the duty rubric to determine you discourse whole the duty criteria.
ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MIS500 Setations of Information Systems
Duty Lore repute
Individual/Group Individual
Length 1000 articulation +/- 10%
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful
completion of the undertaking under embrace:
a) Exactly analyse the explanation information systems concepts and
technologies in the composition of coeval businesses and
organisations.
Submission By 11:55 PM AEST Friday of Module 2.2 (Week 4)
Weighting 25%
Total Marks 100 marks
MIS500_Duty 1_brief_Lore Repute_Module 2.2 Page 2 of 5
Referencing
This is a lore ordinance and as such you are required to decipher and lore widely. A minimum
of 10 pointences are required. You may correction a election of irrelative types of rises baring at decisive 5 of
the pointences must be from Academic rises (eg journals, books and University instrument). As
the subject-matters are coeval you earn scarcity to appendix this lore by deciphering other high
quality non-Academic texts such as estimable newspapers, TED talks, Magazines love Wired and
oranisations websites. You must accept a exact conjecture when deciphering these texts. Your rises should
be from the decisive five years
It is regulative that you correction mismisappropriate APA fashion ce citing and pointencing lore. Please see
past information on pointencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
Submission Instruction
Please propose ONE Word instrument (.doc or .docx) via the Duty 1 individuality set in the
main navigation menu of the MIS500 Blackboard office. The Learning Facilitator earn provide
feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS entrance. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
Academic Integrity Declaration
I wholeege that bar where I accept pointenced, the labor I am proposeting ce this duty undertaking is
my possess labor. I accept decipher and am certified of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy
and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms
I am certified that I scarcity to celebrate a observation of whole proposeted symbolical and their drafts, and I earn do so
accordingly.
MIS500_Duty 1_brief_Lore Repute_Module 2.2 Page 3 of 5
Duty Rubric
Assessment
Attributes
Fail
(Yet to achieve
minimum type)
0-49%
Pass
(Functional)
50-64%
Credit
(Proficient)
65-74%
Distinction
(Advanced)
75-84%
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
Introduction
10%
No obvious identification of
the subject-matter or overview of
the repute.
The repute does referable obviously
discourse the extrinsic(s) and
no overview is verified.
Still has extent ce
improvement to be
completely delicious. Has
potential to extend the next
flatten baring amplifyment still
requires past contact
to easily remunerate criteria
requirements.
Very cheerful coercionce. Has
elements of distinction baring
needs to be congruous.
There is an accurate
statement of subject-matter,
definition of explanation concepts,
overview of what to expect
in the quiet of the quiet of the
report.
Outstanding contact of
effort. There is an accurate
statement of subject-matter,
definition of explanation concepts,
overview of what to expect
in the quiet of the quiet of the
essay is polite enunciated.
Proof established
discussion and exact
analysis
30%
Force considered inferior
to the required minimum
standard. No coercionce at a
discussion or exact
review.
Information is gathered from
a uncompounded rise.
Lacks a basic information of
the field; chosen rises
irbearing to project;
misinterprets rises
Information is gathered
from a poor estimate of
sources.
Demonstrates a basic
information of the field;
chosen rises bearing to
project
Information is gathered
from multiple rises.
Demonstrates proficient
information of the field;
thorough election of
sources proper to project
Information is gathered
from multiple, loreestablished rises.
Demonstrates barional
depth of information of the
field; Comprehensive correction of
most fresh and seminal
sources.
Information and
construction of explanation
concepts
30%
Did referable demonstrate
information or
construction of the explanation
concepts.
Ideas were unclear. Little
proof of discerning or
originality.
Ideas were bearing and
stated. Misappropriate
concepts were embraced.
Demonstrated information
of the explanation issues. Mid-level
originality.
Ideas were bearing and
clearly methodic. Misappropriate
concepts were embraced.
Demonstrated competence
and information of the explanation
issues. Cheerful flatten of
originality
Ideas were whole bearing and
clearly methodic. Misappropriate
concepts were embraced
and integrated effectively.
Demonstrated competence
and information of the explanation
issues. High flatten of
originality
Quittance Referable coercionceed. Recommendations do referable
clearly progress from the
Conclusions are mostly
bearing and are linked to
Conclusions are bearing
and sketch the results of
Conclusions are bearing
and precisely sketch the
MIS500_Duty 1_brief_Lore Repute_Module 2.2 Page 4 of 5
Assessment
Attributes
Fail
(Yet to achieve
minimum type)
0-49%
Pass
(Functional)
50-64%
Credit
(Proficient)
65-74%
Distinction
(Advanced)
75-84%
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
10%
document, and/or misunderstand explanation
findings. They are referable polite
organised.
the results of the
document.
Recommendations do referable
Clearly progress from the
document, and/or misunderstand explanation
findings. They are referable polite
organised.
the instrument.
Recommendations, if
applicable, are particular,
action-oriented
suggestions, oriented to
topic. Recommendations
logically progress from the
instrument baring the logic may
referable regularly be obvious.
results of the instrument.
Recommendations if
applicable are particular,
action-oriented
suggestions, oriented to
the subject-matter, and bearing.
Recommendations argumentatively
progress from the instrument in
a deportment which is evident
to the decipherer.
Correction of academic and
discipline conventions
Percentage ce this
criterion = 20%
Reader has difficulty
following the instrument.
Demonstrates
incongruous correction of cheerful
quality, trustworthy and
bearing instrument to
support and amplify
ideas.
Referencing is omitted or
does referable personate APA.
Poor expression, spelling and
punctuation. Low decipherability
of instrument.
Demonstrates correction of trustworthy
and bearing instrument to
support and amplify ideas,
excepting these are referable regularly
explicit or polite amplifyed.
Referencing personates APA,
with repeated or repeated
errors.
Intermittent unimportant errors
present in spelling,
expression and/or
punctuation.
Communicates in a
coherent and decipherable
deportment that adheres to the
given cemat.
Precisely employs
specialised expression and
terminology.
Meaning is self-possessed to flourish.
Information, arguments and
proof are structured and
sequenced in a coercionm that is
obvious and argumentative.
Spelling, expression and
punctuation are loose from
errors.
Communicates coherently
and concisely in a deportment
that adheres to the given
format.
Precisely employs a wide
range of specialised
expression and terminology.
Engages interview cause.
Information, arguments and
proof are structured and
sequenced in a coercionm that is,
obvious and insinuating.
Spelling, expression and
punctuation are loose from
errors.
Communicates eloquently.
Expresses meaning
coherently, concisely and
creatively among the given
format.
Discerningly selects and
precisely employs a wide
range of specialised
expression and terminology.
Engages and sustains
audience’s cause.
Information, arguments
and proof are insightful,
MIS500_Duty 1_brief_Lore Repute_Module 2.2 Page 5 of 5
Assessment
Attributes
Fail
(Yet to achieve
minimum type)
0-49%
Pass
(Functional)
50-64%
Credit
(Proficient)
65-74%
Distinction
(Advanced)
75-84%
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
Demonstrates correction of
trustworthy instrument to
support and amplify ideas.
Referencing personates APA,
with intermittent errors.
Demonstrates correction of cheerful
quality, trustworthy and
bearing instrument to
support and amplify
arguments and statements.
Show proof of wide
scope among the
organisation ce sourcing
evidence.
APA pointencing is loose
from errors.
insinuating and expertly
presented.
Demonstrates correction of highquality, trustworthy and
bearing instrument to
support and amplify
arguments and position
statements.
Show proof of wide
scope among and without
the organisation ce
sourcing proof.
APA pointencing is loose
from errors.

Related Post