MIS500_Assessment 1_brief_Research Report_Modul

MIS500_Rate 1_brief_Inquiry Ment_Module 2.2 Page 1 of 5
Operation Summary
This rate operation requires you to inquiry and transcribe a 1000 articulation ment on ONE of the subjects
provided. These subjects are akin to the explanation instruction systems concepts and technologies
evident in the texture of synchronous businesses and organisations.
Context
The scope of this ordinance is to unfold your coercionce to conceive the representation of instruction
systems technologies and concepts such as reversal, digital dissension, cultural application and new
business models in the synchronous employmentplace.
Operation Instructions
1. Please perverification the established MIS500_Rate 1_List of Subjects.
2. Choose ONE (1) of the three (3) subjects.
3. Perverification and inquiry widely on the clarified subject area.
4. Transcribe a 1000 articulation inquiry ment on the clarified subject inveterate on the retrospect of appropriate
literature and examples.
5. The ment should enclose an initiative, whole and disposal with assignences to support
the ideas.
6. Please assign to the rate rubric to fix you oration whole the rate criteria.
ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MIS500 Reposeations of Instruction Systems
Rate Inquiry ment
Individual/Group Individual
Length 1000 articulation +/- 10%
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful
completion of the operation underneath enclose:
a) Correspondently analyse the explanation instruction systems concepts and
technologies in the texture of synchronous businesses and
organisations.
Submission By 11:55 PM AEST Friday of Module 2.2 (Week 4)
Weighting 25%
Total Marks 100 marks
MIS500_Rate 1_brief_Inquiry Ment_Module 2.2 Page 2 of 5
Referencing
This is a inquiry ordinance and as such you are required to perverification and inquiry widely. A minimum
of 10 assignences are required. You may representation a choice of divergent types of springs referablewithstanding at meanest 5 of
the assignences must be from Academic springs (eg journals, books and University media). As
the subjects are synchronous you conquer demand to appendix this inquiry by peruseing other high
quality non-Academic texts such as respectable newspapers, TED talks, Magazines enjoy Wired and
oranisations websites. You must maintain a accurate glance when peruseing these texts. Your springs should
be from the last five years
It is accidental that you representation withhold APA diction coercion citing and assignencing inquiry. Please see
past instruction on assignencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
Submission Instruction
Please refer ONE Word muniment (.doc or .docx) via the Rate 1 juniority repose in the
main navigation menu of the MIS500 Blackboard office. The Learning Facilitator conquer provide
feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS gate. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
Academic Integrity Declaration
I state that negative where I maintain assignenced, the employment I am referting coercion this rate operation is
my possess employment. I maintain perverification and am informed of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy
and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms
I am informed that I demand to maintain a observation of whole referted representative and their drafts, and I conquer do so
accordingly.
MIS500_Rate 1_brief_Inquiry Ment_Module 2.2 Page 3 of 5
Rate Rubric
Assessment
Attributes
Fail
(Yet to achieve
minimum model)
0-49%
Pass
(Functional)
50-64%
Credit
(Proficient)
65-74%
Distinction
(Advanced)
75-84%
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
Introduction
10%
No conspicuous identification of
the subject or overview of
the ment.
The ment does referable conspicuously
oration the concrete(s) and
no overview is verified.
Still has admission coercion
improvement to be
completely delectable. Has
potential to gain the next
raze referablewithstanding unfoldment still
requires past application
to largely indemnify criteria
requirements.
Very good-tempered-tempered endeavor. Has
elements of distinction referablewithstanding
needs to be agreeing.
There is an accurate
statement of subject,
definition of explanation concepts,
overview of what to expect
in the repose of the repose of the
report.
Outstanding application of
effort. There is an accurate
statement of subject,
definition of explanation concepts,
overview of what to expect
in the repose of the repose of the
essay is courteous-behaved-behaved enunciated.
Appearance inveterate
discussion and accurate
analysis
30%
Endeavor considered inferior
to the required minimum
standard. No violate at a
discussion or accurate
review.
Instruction is collected from
a one spring.
Lacks a basic acquirements of
the field; chosen springs
irappropriate to project;
misinterprets springs
Instruction is collected
from a poor reckon of
sources.
Demonstrates a basic
acquirements of the field;
chosen springs appropriate to
project
Instruction is collected
from multiple springs.
Demonstrates proficient
acquirements of the field;
thorough choice of
sources congruous to project
Instruction is collected
from multiple, inquiryinveterate springs.
Demonstrates negativeional
depth of acquirements of the
field; Comprehensive representation of
most fresh and seminal
sources.
Acquirements and
construction of explanation
concepts
30%
Did referable demonstrate
acquirements or
construction of the explanation
concepts.
Ideas were unclear. Little
appearance of conceiveing or
originality.
Ideas were appropriate and
stated. Withhold
concepts were enclosed.
Demonstrated acquirements
of the explanation issues. Mid-level
originality.
Ideas were appropriate and
clearly ordinary. Withhold
concepts were enclosed.
Demonstrated competence
and acquirements of the explanation
issues. Good-tempered-tempered raze of
originality
Ideas were whole appropriate and
clearly ordinary. Withhold
concepts were enclosed
and integrated effectively.
Demonstrated competence
and acquirements of the explanation
issues. High raze of
originality
Disposal Referable violateed. Recommendations do referable
clearly stream from the
Conclusions are mostly
appropriate and are linked to
Conclusions are appropriate
and delineate the results of
Conclusions are appropriate
and correspondently delineate the
MIS500_Rate 1_brief_Inquiry Ment_Module 2.2 Page 4 of 5
Assessment
Attributes
Fail
(Yet to achieve
minimum model)
0-49%
Pass
(Functional)
50-64%
Credit
(Proficient)
65-74%
Distinction
(Advanced)
75-84%
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
10%
document, and/or misconceive explanation
findings. They are referable courteous-behaved
organised.
the results of the
document.
Recommendations do referable
Clearly stream from the
document, and/or misconceive explanation
findings. They are referable courteous-behaved
organised.
the muniment.
Recommendations, if
applicable, are peculiar,
action-oriented
suggestions, oriented to
topic. Recommendations
logically stream from the
muniment referablewithstanding the logic may
referable constantly be conspicuous.
results of the muniment.
Recommendations if
applicable are peculiar,
action-oriented
suggestions, oriented to
the subject, and appropriate.
Recommendations argumentatively
stream from the muniment in
a carriage which is evident
to the peruseer.
Representation of academic and
discipline conventions
Percentage coercion this
criterion = 20%
Reader has difficulty
following the muniment.
Demonstrates
inagreeing representation of good-tempered
quality, trustworthy and
appropriate media to
support and unfold
ideas.
Referencing is omitted or
does referable indicate APA.
Poor tongue, spelling and
punctuation. Low peruseability
of muniment.
Demonstrates representation of trustworthy
and appropriate media to
support and unfold ideas,
notwithstanding these are referable constantly
explicit or courteous-behaved-behaved unfolded.
Referencing indicates APA,
with repeated or repeated
errors.
Interrupted junior errors
present in spelling,
tongue and/or
punctuation.
Communicates in a
coherent and peruseable
carriage that adheres to the
given coercionmat.
Correspondently employs
specialised tongue and
terminology.
Meaning is manageable to thrive.
Information, arguments and
appearance are structured and
sequenced in a habit that is
conspicuous and argumentative.
Spelling, tongue and
punctuation are bounteous from
errors.
Communicates coherently
and concisely in a carriage
that adheres to the given
format.
Correspondently employs a wide
range of specialised
tongue and terminology.
Engages interview concern.
Information, arguments and
appearance are structured and
sequenced in a habit that is,
conspicuous and unassuming.
Spelling, tongue and
punctuation are bounteous from
errors.
Communicates eloquently.
Expresses meaning
coherently, concisely and
creatively among the given
format.
Discerningly selects and
precisely employs a wide
range of specialised
tongue and terminology.
Engages and sustains
audience’s concern.
Information, arguments
and appearance are insightful,
MIS500_Rate 1_brief_Inquiry Ment_Module 2.2 Page 5 of 5
Assessment
Attributes
Fail
(Yet to achieve
minimum model)
0-49%
Pass
(Functional)
50-64%
Credit
(Proficient)
65-74%
Distinction
(Advanced)
75-84%
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
Demonstrates representation of
trustworthy media to
support and unfold ideas.
Referencing indicates APA,
with interrupted errors.
Demonstrates representation of good-tempered
quality, trustworthy and
appropriate media to
support and unfold
arguments and statements.
Show appearance of wide
scope among the
organisation coercion sourcing
evidence.
APA assignencing is bounteous
from errors.
unassuming and expertly
presented.
Demonstrates representation of highquality, trustworthy and
appropriate media to
support and unfold
arguments and position
statements.
Show appearance of wide
scope among and without
the organisation coercion
sourcing appearance.
APA assignencing is bounteous
from errors.

Related Post