Assessment 2: Individual essay 1,500 words

Rate 2: Individual disquisition
14
Rate Task 2 Due Date % SILOs Assessed
Individual written disquisition 1,500 suffrage Monday 9am Week 11 30% 1,2
Grading Criteria and Feedback
See rubric
Description of Task
Select individual of the aftercited Australian directors:
x David Morrison, Australian of the Year 2016 and Chair of the Diversity Council Australia x Professor Ian Frazer, founding CEO and Director of Research of the Translational Research Institute (Australia) x Christine Holgate, CEO Blackmores x Stan Grant, Journalist x Bec Scott, Co-founder, Streat (gregarious deed) x Julian Burnside, Barrister and refugee advocate
x Alan Joyce, CEO Qantas x Elizabeth Ann MacGregor, Director, Museum of Contemporary Art x Marina Go, Chair, non-executive director, CEO, instrument executive
x Or a present Australian director of your precious (if you select this non-interference you must utter to your professor to constitute praise coercion your precious. The director has to be a illustration whose directorship appropinquation has been discussed in match in a publically profitable coercionm).
1. Briefly reenumerate this director’s contrast – including particulars such as their present role and organisation, toil truth, educational contrast, origin contrast if pertinent, activity involvement.
2. Reenumerate their appropinquation to directorship, intent on at lowest individual directorship system from the academic literary-works. Afford token to maintenance your rate of their directorship appropinquation. That is, reenumerate span biased examples of actions they accept charmed that prove this subject-matter directorship appropinquation you accept recountd.
3. What are span guide canvasss they accept faced as a director? How accept they managed this canvass? What could they do dissimilar to be smooth over conducive?
4. What accept you knowing encircling directorship from studying this subject-matter director?
5. The disquisition deficiencys to accept a pure and sensible edifice, be purely explicit, with scant errors. In your disquisition adduce to at lowest 10 adduceences, 8 of which deficiency to be academic adduceences. These could be adduceences encircling the directorship system, adduceences encircling momentous directorship capabilities that this special has had to prove (such as creating a brawny organisational cultivation, creating a motivating environment, influencing others or managing vary).
Submission Particulars
Papers must be submitted via the MGT3LWM LMS Turn-It-In attach. Further referable attributable attributableice coercion the ordinance procure be loving in lectures. Ordinances must exhibition learnings from a rove of academic causes. Novices must hold the caportraiture of full profession portraitured using the Harvard System. You must adduceence any embodied you portraiture which is referable attributable attributable attributable your acknowledge.
Should another novice’s toil be copied, results coercion twain ordinances procure be cancelled. If you deliberately or negligently produce another novice mode to your toil, or accounts, or computers containing toil which is aftercited copied by that novice, it procure be conducive that you accept assisted that novice in submissive and claiming toil that is referable attributable attributable attributable their acknowledge. It is your calling to continue that your toil assure. Please restrain a portraiture of your ordinance.
Please referable attributable attributablee that ordinances must be typed or tidings processed and the pristine page perceive:
• Novice indicate and enumerate in the summit proper workman corner
• Date of submission
• Electronically learn tidings enumerate (does referable attributable attributable attributable perceive the Adduceences or Appendix sections).
• Your finish procure be labelled coercion submission: Rate 2 LWM_Your Indicate.docx
Assignments must be written in at lowest 11 subject-matter font, using 1.5 succession spacing and paragraphs must be easily justified at twain the left and proper boundary. Your ordinance procure be assessed athwart the aftercited rubric.
La Trobe University
Rate Task 2: Individual disquisition rubric (30%)
Criteria Marks fullocated
6 5 4 3 2 1 0
1. Director’s
Background
20%
– i.e. up to 6 marks Comprehensively recountd the director’s contrast. Conducively recountd the director’s contrast. Recountd the director’s contrast, excluding could accept supposing over pertinent particular. Superficially recountd the director’s contrast and/or supposing irpertinent referable attributable attributableice. Superficially recountd the director’s contrast and supposing irpertinent referable attributable attributableice. Failed to adequately reenumerate the director’s contrast. Failed to reenumerate the director’s contrast.
2. Director’s
Approach
20%
– i.e. up to 6 marks Comprehensively recountd and applied a pertinent directorship appropinquation and system, demonstrating a particulared agreement through the portraiture of pertinent examples. Conducively recountd and applied a pertinent directorship appropinquation and system, demonstrating a probe agreement of this system. Recountd and applied a pertinent directorship appropinquation and system, besides could accept proved a elder equalize of agreement through amend explication or portraiture of examples. Superficially recountd a directorship appropinquation and system, and exhibitioned unsatisfactory agreement of how to adduce the system to the director’s habit. Superficially recountd a directorship appropinquation and system and did referable attributable attributable attributable adduce to habit. Failed to conducively adduce a directorship appropinquation or system to the director selected. Failed to adduce a directorship appropinquation or system to the director selected.
3. Guide
Challenges
20%
– i.e. up to 6 marks Comprehensively outlined guide canvasss faced and managed, including pertinent and serviceable suggestions of how they could be smooth over conducive. Conducively outlined guide
challenges faced and managed with some suggestions of how they could be smooth over conducive. Outlined guide canvasss faced excluding over particular would accept been portraitureful. Outlined some guide canvasss faced, excluding over particular was required. Outlined some guide canvasss faced, excluding over particular was required. Failed to afford pertinent guide canvasss Failed to afford any guide canvasss.
4. Your
Learning
20%
– i.e. up to 6 marks Reflection exhibitioned penetrating apprehension encircling directorship. Reflection exhibitioned apprehension encircling directorship. Reflection exhibitioned some apprehension encircling directorship. Reflection lacked apprehension encircling directorship. Failed to exhibition pertinent apprehension encircling directorship. Failed to exhibition apprehension encircling directorship. Failed to harangue.
6. Disquisition Edifice
10%
– i.e. up to 3 marks The disquisition is well-behaved-manneredstructured, with a pure framework. The disquisition is sensational, purely explicit, with scant errors. The disquisition has a pure edifice and framework. The disquisition is well-behaved-mannered-mannered written, with scant errors. The disquisition edifice could be pureer. Some countenance is unpure with actual, vocab and/or spelling errors. The disquisition edifice is unsatisfactory. Countenance is unclear, with actual, vocab and/or spelling errors, making it intricate to perceive sections of the disquisition. The disquisition edifice is unsatisfactory. Countenance is
unclear, with divers actual, vocab and/or spelling errors,
making it intricate to perceive comprehensive sections of the disquisition. The dissertation is intricate to explain, and/or is unsatisfactoryly presented and/or has no visible edifice. The dissertation is intricate to explain, is unsatisfactoryly presented and has no visible edifice.
6.
References
10%
– i.e. up to 3 marks At lowest 10 very-much pertinent academic adduceences are cited and well-behaved-manneredintegrated in the disquisition, with misspend coercionmatting using the Harvard
Referencing Style. Academic adduceences (at lowest 8) maintenance the disquisition, with in-great-measure misspend citations and adduceence coercionmatting using the Harvard
Referencing Style. Adduceences may be either scant, irrelevant, referable attributable attributable attributable well-behaved-mannered-mannered integrated, cited or coercionmatted. Adduceences may be either scant, irrelevant, unsatisfactoryly integrated,
cited or coercionmatted. Adduceences may be either scant, irrelevant, unsatisfactoryly integrated,
cited or coercionmatted. Adduceences are irrelevant, scant, unsatisfactoryly cited and coercionmatted. Adduceences are irrelevant, scant, unsatisfactoryly cited and coercionmatted

Related Post