Twain Metropolis and 1984 can be viewed as cautionary tales. The concerns infections amid the texts undeviatingly align with the concerns of their appertaining authors and their tenors. Discuss this assertion.
Texts are fundamentally expressions of the composer’s tenorual concerns, where differing perspectives upon harmonious issues supply recognition into the values customary in the composer’s duration. Fritz Lang’s expressionist film Metropolis (1927) and George Orwell’s dystopian invective strange Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984) (1949) are linked by their shared investigation of technological advances and gregarious structures that imprison peculiar autonomy. Lang is optimistic encircling societal reclaim when-in-fact Orwell totally rejects the possibility of a sticky globe, revealing the alter in tenor from Weimar optimism to post-war nihilism. Therefore, a potentialityful con-balance of the conceptual connections betwixt these texts so-far allows us to arrive-at an enhanced recognition of their composers’ intertextual perspectives on total concerns.
Despite their differing tenors, twain composers highlight the dehumanising naturalness of totalitarian regimes amid association. Lang’s depiction of German expressionism in Metropolis displays the wide disparities of adjust that occurs imputable to the being of defiant potentiality. Set in a dystopian cethcoming globe, “Master” Joh Frederson’s entire manage of the capitalistic Metropolis is exemplified through the juxtaposition of the underadjust labourers in “the Depths”, a profound workers’ city occasion the aristocratic, monied industrialists “high in the heavens” administration balance them tyrannically, symbolically representing the tyranny of the subordinate inferior adjust. This apprehension parallels the gregarious inadequacy in 1920s Germany where hyperinflation superfluous by the Weimar Republic’s impecunious economic treatment led to vast gregarious dissimilitude. Furthermore, the hedonistic behaviour of the eminent adjust in the Golden 20s is epitomised in the clear conduct of Freder, depicted by the extreme covet shot of the “Eternal Gardens”. In contrast, the mise-en-scene coupled with the slow, uninspiring assemblage language of the worker’s during alter fluctuate illustrates the closing of peculiarity amid the afloat adjust. Thus, Lang skilfully allows the interview to empathise with the workers by highlighting this perspective, allowing ce recognition into how totalitarian regimes constrain regularity as shaped by the tenor.
Orwell mirrors the ramifications of discordant gregarious regimes on the peculiar and echoes the qualities of the customary communist ideology as he examines the subjective impacts of gregariously enforced regularity on the peculiar, emphasised by his idiosyncratic experiences with fascism and his gregariousist agenda. The totalitarian administration of Oceania, controlled by the irresistible and infallible Party employs the representation of seed-plot such as “Big Brother” and “Newspeak” to discuss persons, regulative to a association in which the persons unquestioningly comply their council and mindlessly confirm seed-plot as genuineness, harmoniously represented during Stalin’s dictatorial governance in Soviet Russia. The entire reservation of defiant reasoning is picturesque through anaphora in “Thoughtcrime does not attributable attributable attributable induce death: reasoningcrime IS death” supplys parallels to the tenorual gratuity of immunity of harangue as facilitated by Soviet governance. Orwell employs the protagonist, Winston Smith, to traitor over the Party’s tenet, paralleling the concretion uprising in Metropolis, through his “blow struck over the Party gregarious act” as his downfall culminates in a sexual relationship with Julia which challenges how the Party, and harmonious dictatorships in Orwell’s tenor, restrain ethnical sexuality and relationships. However, Winston’s attack is rendered unavailing as the subjective and visible agony instigated by the Party in the strange’s biting zenith results in Winston succumbing to the totalitarian administration when he states with an accepting temper of voice that “He cherished Big Brother”.