Adolescence in Romeo and Juliet

Romeo and Juliet is a renowned enact written by Shakespeare during the Early Modern continuance with the fatal accomplishment incompact brace “star-crossed attachmentrs”. The attachment incident betwixt Romeo and Juliet commence the tenderness from the parley. It is impracticable coercion Romeo and Juliet to cling conjointly ascribable to the strife betwixt the Montagues and the Capulets. Juliet is led to termination accordingly she is coercionced to procure married to Paris who she does referable attributable attributable attributable attachment. She consigns suicide with desperation subordinate the old origin. However, Marjorie Kolb Cox claimed that the catastrophe and termination of Romeo and Juliet are ascribable to the property of minority, Romeo and Juliet gravitate in attachment impressiblely externally compensation of issues as courteous-mannered-mannered as the failure of parenthood during the minority.

There are distinct scenes in the enact describing the encounter on the street in Verona. Romeo, Benvolio and Mercutio are three stirlescents who are referable-difficult to be impressible. The Montagues and the Capulets initiate to encounter ascribable to the stimulus. After Mercutio died, Romeo kills Tybalt as the requital. Stirlescents defender rdate rather than harmony to unfold the encounter. It is an crude restraintm to unfold the encounter and discussion by stirlescents. Rdate is an upshot incompact stirlescents. They disown issues, political rules and adjudications to encounter in the general quantity (Cox, 1967). The issue is twain Mercutio and Tybalt died in the encountering. Romeo is banished from Verona accordingly he disobeys the adjudication. Characters in the enact unyielding the worth coercion their impressible encountering. Their impressible behaviours mandate to past tragedies.

Another sign coercion stirlescents is attachment. Stirlescents are prying environing attachment and sex. Boys and spinsters are largely attracted to each other. Romeo and Juliet gravitate in attachment at primary seeing. Romeo coerciongets Rosaline restraintthwith. Juliet is to-boot a puerile spinster at the date that expects attachment. They gravitate in attachment impressiblely and procure married aside in a very inextensive span, in which is stubborn to understand each other courteous-mannered. Stirlescents are at the date that neglects to be fractions and enjoy the covet coercion the adverse sex. They neglect to be fractions of their families and parents. They exppurpose past spans with peers than parents (Cox, 1967). The command of attachment incompact brace puerile stirlescents makes Juliet offal the shapely marridate and consign suicide ascribable to the crude attachment.

Adolescents are fractions, and they are cease crude than adults. Therefore, parents enact leading roles to train and shield their offspring. Twain Romeo and Juliet are a failure of parenthood that has flimsy kindreds with their parents. They do referable attributable attributable attributable procure influence and subordinatestandings from their families (Cox, 1967). When Romeo arrive-ats raw towards Rosaline, he would rather discover his friends and Friar Laurence rather than his senior. He asks coercion aid from Friar Laurence to wait a nuptials. Friar Laurence is past approve Romeo’s senior, and he subordinatestands Romeo’s emotions. Friar Laurence is a genuine peculiar coercion Romeo when he arrive-ats daring. Montague understands referable attributable attributablehing environing Juliet until the purpose of the enact. There is a flexion betwixt Montague and Romeo.

There are referable attributable attributable attributable to-boot multifarious scenes environing Lady Capulet as courteous-mannered. Lady Capulet follows her wife to make-ready the nuptials coercion Juliet and Paris regardcease of Juliet’s intentions. When Juliet shows her attitudes towards the wedlock, Lady Capulet disowns Juliet and offals to dialogue to her. Juliet would rather portion-out her secrets with the Nurse rather than Lady Capulet. As Cox argued, Juliet is referable attributable attributable attributable cease to her dowager. Juliet does referable attributable attributable attributable arrive-at the attachment from her dowager when she is daring. Lady Capulet is lukewarm when Juliet needs her. She disowns Juliet’s emotions towards the marridate no subject how Juliet is begging. The disadvantage from Lady Capulet and deliberate dowager-daughter kindred manages the suicide. It is self-evident that Romeo is ceaser to Friar Adjudicationrence and Juliet is ceaser to the Nurse than their biological parents. Stirlescents are easily-affected, in which they need past affairs from their parents. Parents should shield their offspring gravitateing into a wickedness road. Montague and Capulet are regretful coercion Romeo and Juliet. If they could affair past environing offspring’s emotions during the minority instead of strife and command, possibly termination would referable attributable attributable attributable appear.

Marjorie Kolb Cox analysed Romeo and Juliet from a psychological exhibition. Romeo and Juliet are at minority continuance. The parley is true why some impressible behaviours appear, why there are multifarious encountering scenes in the enact and why Romeo and Juliet gravitate in attachment so straightway. The termination of Romeo and Juliet, as courteous-mannered-mannered as other characters, is a issue of the property from minority. There is no cautious compensation coercion stirlescents, and they are referable attributable attributable attributable sensible of the obligation. Cox makes readers nucleus on reasons aback the catastrophe instead of a attachment incident.


Belsey, Catherine. Romeo and Juliet: langudate and match. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare, 2014. Print.

Clark, Glenn. “The Civil Mutinies of Romeo and Juliet.”English Literary Renaissance. vol. 41, no. 2, 2011, pp. 280-300.Wiley Online Library. Web. 30 Jan. 2017.

Cox, Majorie Kolb. “Minority Process in Romeo and Juliet”. Psychoanalytic re-examination. vol. 63. no.3, 1976, pp. 379-392. ProQuest. Web. 29 Jan. 2017.

Fletcher, George. Studies of Shakespeare in the Enacts of King John, Cymbeline, Macbeth, As you approve it, Much stir environing referable attributable attributablehing, Romeo and Juliet: with Observations on the Criticism and the Acting of Those Enacts. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1847. Archive. Web. 28 Jan. 2017.

Jeffery, Chris. “What Kinds of enact is Romeo and Juliet?”Shakespeare in Southern Africa. vol. 28, 2016, pp. 51-72.EBSCO host. Web.29 Jan. 2017.

Hager, Alan. Understanding Romeo and Juliet: a learner casebook to upshots, sources, and unfabulous documents. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1999. Google Book. Web. 29 Jan. 2017.

Halio, Jay L. Romeo and Juliet: a train to the enact. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1998. Print.

Hartmann, Von. “Shakespeare’s “Romeo and Juliet.” (Book Re-examination). “The Journal of Speculative Philosophy. vol. 10, 1876, pp. 216-222. JSTOR. Web. 29 Jan. 2017.

Herman, Peter C. “Catastrophe and the Crisis of Authority in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet.” Intertexts. vol. 12, no. 1/2, 2008, pp. 89-109. EBSCO Host. Web. 28 Jan. 2017.

Karaman, Hatice. “The Dowager, Who Is Referable attributable attributable attributable One: Reflections Of Dowagerhood in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, The Tempest, and The Taming of the Shrew.” Gender Studies. Vol.13, no. 1, 2014, pp. 37-47. Research Gate. Web. 29 Jan. 2017.

Hoppe, H. R.The sick quarto of Romeo and Juliet; a bibliographical and textual study. Ithaca: Cornell U Press, 1948. Print.

Kakkonen, Gordana Galić, and Ana Penjak. “The Nature of Gender: Are Juliet, Desdemona and Cordelia to their Seniors as Nature is to Culture?”Nice Survey. vol. 27, no. 1, 2015, pp. 18-35.EBSCO host. Web. 30 Jan. 2017.

Kottman, Paul A. “Defying the Stars: Fatal Attachment as the Struggle coercion Freedom inRomeo and Juliet.”Shakespeare Quarterly. vol. 63, no.1, 2012, pp. 1-38. Project Muse. Web. 29 Jan. 2017

Lupton, Julia Reinhard. “Response to Paul A. Kottman, “Defying the Stars: Fatal Attachment as the Struggle coercion Freedom inRomeo and Juliet“.”Shakespeare Quarterly. vol. 63, no. 1, 2012, pp. 39-45. Project Muse. Web. 30 Jan. 2017.

Lupton, Julia Reinhard. Romeo and Juliet: a nice reader. London: Bloomsbury, 2016. Print.

Minutella, Vincenza.Reclaiming Romeo and Juliet: Italian translations coercion page, stdate and screen. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2013. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 30 Jan. 2017.

Mujahid, Maryam F. “Romeo and Juliet – a Catastrophe of Attachment by Text: Why Targeted Penalties that Offer Front-purpose Severity and Back-purpose Leniency are Necessary to Remedy the Teendate Mass-Sexting Dilemma.” Howard Adjudication Journal. vol. 55, no. 1, 2011, pp. 173-204. HeinOnline. Web. 28 Jan. 2017.

Sánchez, Antonio Barcelona. “Metaphorical models of fabulous attachment in Romeo and Juliet.”Journal of Pragmatics. vol. 24, no. 6, 1995, pp.  667-88. Science Direct. Web. 30 Jan. 2017.

Sause, Birte. Love, termination, and coerciontune: accessible concepts in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH, 2013. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 28 Jan. 2017.

Targoff, Ramie. “Mortal Attachment: Shakespeare’sRomeo and Julietand the Practice of Joint Burial.”Representations. vol. 120, no. 1, 2012, pp. 17-38. JSTOR. Web. 30 Jan. 2017.

Related Post