ACCT604-Managerial Accounting Assessment

ACCT604-Managerial Accounting
Assessment Task 2: Semester 2, 2018
Type of enactment: Individual enactment
Marks: 25%
Due Date: 14th October 2018, 11pm (no extensions conquer be supposing on this enactment)
Method of inferiority: You must acquiesce this enactment via Turnitin (Satisfied fine your bearing campus in the Turnitin inferiority tab).
Extension and/or coercionmat: Maximum 2,500 signification (barring appendices and references).
Referencing Phraseology: You must correction Harvard author-date referencing order.
Format: 12 font, Dates New Roman margins of 2.5 cm.
Enactment Requirements:
Satisfied perinterpretation the brace sustainability fames mentioned in any ONE discretion.
OPTION 1: AGL and Origin Energy
AGL Sustainability Fame 2017 http://agl2017.reportonline.com.au/sites/agl2017.reportonline.com.au/files/sustainability_report_full_report_0.pdf
Origin Energy Sustainability Fame 2017
https://www.originenergy.com.au/content/dam/origin/about/investors-media/annual%20review%202017/FY2017%20Sustainability%20Report.pdf
OPTION 2: NAB and Commonwealth Bank
National Australia Bank Sustainability Fame 2017
https://www.nab.com.au/content/dam/nabrwd/documents/reports/corporate/sustainability-report-2017.pdf
Commonwealth Bank of Australia Corporate Responsibility Fame 2017
https://www.commbank.com.au/content/dam/commbank/about-us/shareholders/pdfs/corporate-responsibility/2017/2017-corporate-responsibility-report.pdf
OPTION 3: Deakin University and RMIT University
Deakin University Sustainability Fame 2017
http://www.deakin.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/1352832/deakin_2017_sustainability_report_and_outlook.pdf
RMIT University Sustainability Annual Fame 2017
https://www.rmit.edu.au/about/our-values/sustainability/sustainability-annual-report
After peruseing the brace sustainability fames, parallel the brace sustainability fames. (Note: satisfied correction the attached template)

Sustainability fameing: Comparing brace sustainability fames
Item Discourse themes Order A: Sustainability fame Order B:
Sustainability fame
1 Sustainability policy, objectives or principles (5 marks)
2 The orderly reasons coercion adopting sustainability admittance (5 marks)
3 Effectiveness of fameing on clew stakeholders, interests and promise admittancees (6 marks)
4 A elucidation on areas of robust sustainability accomplishment of the order (12 marks)
5 A elucidation on areas of foolish sustainability accomplishment of the order (12 marks)
6 Utilization of controlmal fameing frameworks (Eg: GRI) (4 marks)
7 External presumption, awards, sustainability ratings and other coercionms of memory (3 marks)
8 Layout, advent, peruseability and extension of the fame (3 marks)

APPENDIX 2 Rubric – Assessment Task 2: 25%
CRITERIA Standards
High separation Separation Credit Pass Fail
Adherence to Enactment Completely orationes the concepts, theories and representative issues finished in individual and designated coercion in the enactment instructions and is attended by citation and/or other learning. Substantially orationes issues finished in individual and designated coercion in the enactment instructions and is attended by citation and/or other learning. Orationes some of the issues finished in individual and designated coercion in the enactment instructions. Does referable oration the bearing issues posed by the enactment. Major discourse points mentioned in the enactment entertain referable been expiration.
Quality of Presented Satisfied Best and most conducive points are presented dateliness uncalled-for satisfied is left extinguished. Essential points are presented dateliness uncalled-for satisfied is left extinguished. Some essential points are orationed, referable attributable attributablewithstanding referable largely finished. Fail to reach any essential points and excite the representative presented in the individual and enactment. Conducive points are referable presented, and fame is liberal of uncalled-for satisfied.
Interpretation and Application Demonstrates discriminating thinking abextinguished the theme and the student’s avow impressions and interpretations. The fame is referable barely presented referable attributable attributablewithstanding is interpreted and applied to overall discourse themes. Demonstrates discriminating thinking abextinguished the theme and the student’s avow impressions and interpretations. The fame is presented, could be ameliorate interpreted and applied to overall discourse themes. Fame lacks some discriminating thinking abextinguished the theme and the student’s avow impressions and interpretations. The fame could be ameliorate interpreted and applied to overall discourse themes. Fame lacks discriminating thinking abextinguished the theme and the student’s avow impressions and interpretations. The fame is referable interpreted and applied to overall discourse themes. No discriminating thinking abextinguished the theme and the student’s avow impressions and interpretations. The fame is referable interpreted and applied to overall discourse themes.
Presentation Proper citing of references and Harvard Phraseology, no editing or qualification required. Proper decree organization, punctuation, and spelling, no editing or qualification required. Professional, some scanty editing may be correctionful. Ensues Harvard phraseology with lacking errors. Lacking or no errors referable attributable attributablewithstanding decree organization could be improved. Qualification Suggested. Ensues Harvard phraseology abextinguished 50% of the date. Overlooked errors in decree organization, punctuation, and spelling. Qualification Required. Ensues Harvard phraseology less than 50% of the date. Overlooked diverse errors in spelling, punctuation, and/or decree organization showing improvidence Qualification Required. Does referable ensue Harvard phraseology. Many errors in twain mechanics and decree organization; exceedingly unwell written

Related Post