ACCT604-Managerial Accounting Assessment

ACCT604-Managerial Accounting
Assessment Task 2: Semester 2, 2018
Type of provision: Individual provision
Marks: 25%
Due Date: 14th October 2018, 11pm (no extensions gain be supposing on this provision)
Method of meekness: You must refer this provision via Turnitin (Gladden chosen your appropriate campus in the Turnitin meekness tab).
Extension and/or cemat: Maximum 2,500 tone (yet appendices and references).
Referencing Name: You must reason Harvard author-date referencing scheme.
Format: 12 font, Terms New Roman margins of 2.5 cm.
Provision Requirements:
Gladden decipher the span sustainability narrations mentioned in any ONE non-interference.
OPTION 1: AGL and Origin Energy
AGL Sustainability Narration 2017 http://agl2017.reportonline.com.au/sites/agl2017.reportonline.com.au/files/sustainability_report_full_report_0.pdf
Origin Energy Sustainability Narration 2017
https://www.originenergy.com.au/content/dam/origin/about/investors-media/annual%20review%202017/FY2017%20Sustainability%20Report.pdf
OPTION 2: NAB and Commonwealth Bank
National Australia Bank Sustainability Narration 2017
https://www.nab.com.au/content/dam/nabrwd/documents/reports/corporate/sustainability-report-2017.pdf
Commonwealth Bank of Australia Corporate Responsibility Narration 2017
https://www.commbank.com.au/content/dam/commbank/about-us/shareholders/pdfs/corporate-responsibility/2017/2017-corporate-responsibility-report.pdf
OPTION 3: Deakin University and RMIT University
Deakin University Sustainability Narration 2017
http://www.deakin.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/1352832/deakin_2017_sustainability_report_and_outlook.pdf
RMIT University Sustainability Annual Narration 2017
https://www.rmit.edu.au/about/our-values/sustainability/sustainability-annual-report
After deciphering the span sustainability narrations, collate the span sustainability narrations. (Note: gladden reason the given template)

Sustainability narrationing: Comparing span sustainability narrations
Item Discourse themes Posse A: Sustainability narration Posse B:
Sustainability narration
1 Sustainability diplomacy, objectives or principles (5 marks)
2 The periodical reasons ce adopting sustainability access (5 marks)
3 Effectiveness of narrationing on guide stakeholders, interests and promise accesses (6 marks)
4 A remark on areas of vigorous sustainability operation of the posse (12 marks)
5 A remark on areas of destructible sustainability operation of the posse (12 marks)
6 Utilization of recognized narrationing frameworks (Eg: GRI) (4 marks)
7 External boldness, awards, sustainability ratings and other cems of memory (3 marks)
8 Layout, probability, decipherability and extension of the narration (3 marks)

APPENDIX 2 Rubric – Assessment Task 2: 25%
CRITERIA Standards
High dignity Dignity Credit Pass Fail
Adherence to Provision Completely addresses the concepts, theories and embodied issues prepared in individual and designated ce in the provision instructions and is cherished by citation and/or other literary-works. Substantially addresses issues prepared in individual and designated ce in the provision instructions and is cherished by citation and/or other literary-works. Addresses some of the issues prepared in individual and designated ce in the provision instructions. Does referable address the appropriate issues posed by the provision. Major discourse points mentioned in the provision feel referable been inhalation.
Quality of Presented Satisfiedededed Best and most beneficial points are presented termliness neednear satisfiedededed is left quenched. Significant points are presented termliness neednear satisfiedededed is left quenched. Some significant points are addressed, excluding referable easily prepared. Fail to execute any significant points and stir the embodied presented in the individual and provision. Beneficial points are referable presented, and narration is ample of neednear satisfiededed.
Interpretation and Application Demonstrates exact thinking abquenched the theme and the student’s avow impressions and interpretations. The narration is referable merely presented excluding is interpreted and applied to overall discourse themes. Demonstrates exact thinking abquenched the theme and the student’s avow impressions and interpretations. The narration is presented, could be ameliorate interpreted and applied to overall discourse themes. Narration lacks some exact thinking abquenched the theme and the student’s avow impressions and interpretations. The narration could be ameliorate interpreted and applied to overall discourse themes. Narration lacks exact thinking abquenched the theme and the student’s avow impressions and interpretations. The narration is referable interpreted and applied to overall discourse themes. No exact thinking abquenched the theme and the student’s avow impressions and interpretations. The narration is referable interpreted and applied to overall discourse themes.
Presentation Proper citing of references and Harvard Name, no editing or variation required. Proper judgment organization, punctuation, and spelling, no editing or variation required. Professional, some frivolous editing may be reasonful. Flourishs Harvard name with lacking errors. Lacking or no errors excluding judgment organization could be improved. Variation Suggested. Flourishs Harvard name abquenched 50% of the term. Overlooked errors in judgment organization, punctuation, and spelling. Variation Required. Flourishs Harvard name near than 50% of the term. Overlooked divers errors in spelling, punctuation, and/or judgment organization showing improvidence Variation Required. Does referable flourish Harvard name. Many errors in twain mechanics and judgment organization; extremely diseased written

Related Post