ACC701 2017 Major Assignment Questions (ATMC) Assessment

ACC701 2017 Major Assignment Scrutinys (ATMC)
Assessment Task 2 – Due Week 9 – 11.55pm (23:55) Monday, 2nd October 2017
Submission procure merely be veritable through Blackboard (Safe Assignment procure be used) and should be submitted as individual (1) MSWord muniment. Referablee Excel spreadsheets canreferable be submitted through SafeAssignment. You must spectry your MSWord muniment refine with your Surname-Initial of your First spectry- your learner ID compute (Restraint example: Smith-W-1234567.docx).
The scrutinys chosen from your citationbook are as follows:
Q.1 – Chapter 10 Problem 14 (pages 354-357) [40%] {900 signification almost}
This scrutiny should be answered from the perspective of a interest recital and demands calculations and completion of homogeneity decomposition. In adduction you are demandd to examine the issues and construct recommendations as elaborate in the Demandments precise in the scrutiny – recommendations and a abridgment.
Q.2 – Chapter 10 Ethics Case Examine (page 357) [25%] {600 signification almost}
This scrutiny is demandd to be answered from the perspective of a interest recital and procure demand attrrenewal of scrutiny and structured restraintm to the decomposition and examineion. It is suggested that you adopt the aftercited headings – Facts; Stakeholders; Problem; Computes and Principles; Possible courses of renewal; Evaluation of each of the courses of renewal; Chosen contemplation of renewal. Referablee: you want to vindicate your contemplation by relation to principles and consequences.
Q.3 – Chapter 12 Problem 10 (pages 405 – 406) [35%] {1,000 signification almost}
This scrutiny is demandd to be answered from the perspective of a interest recital and procure demand attrrenewal of scrutiny and structured restraintm to the decomposition and examineion. In adduction you are demandd to examine the issues and construct recommendations as elaborate in the Demandments precise in the scrutiny.
Appropriate and just scrutiny and referencing are demandd in scrutinys 1 and 2 in point (look marking train).
The aftercited register creed are listed in the APA 6th referencing title restraint your control.
Puttee, C., Vitale, C. & Laing, G. (2011). Eight Dialogues on Interest Ethics: Aspects of Ethical Behaviour in the Corporate Sector. e-Register of Social & Behavioural Scrutiny in Interest. 2(2), 1-17.
Kirkham, R. (2012). Liquidity Decomposition Using Cash Flow Homogeneitys and Traditional Homogeneitys: The Telecommunications Sector in Australia. Register of Odd Interest Ideas & Trends. 10(1), 1-13.
Laing, G. (2013). Different Strategic Types Operating in the Same Industry: A Multiple Case Examine. Interest Management and Strategy. 4(1), 71-85.
Interest Recital
Issue / Criteria
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Satisfactory Less than
Satisfactory
Homogeneity Calculations
20%
(A) & (C) Exemplary work! Explaind greatly acute referableice with inclusive
level of contact & sense. Explaind inclusive
level of contact and sense. Explaind sense & restraintce to direct referableice. Mainly Reform.
Demonstrated minimum/ poor sense and referableice. Referable reform.
Mainly wickedness.
Sense & referableice referable explaind.
Homogeneity Decomposition
20%
(A), (B) & (C) Exemplary work!. Explaind greatly acute referableice with inclusive
level of contact & sense. Explaind inclusive
level of contact and sense. Explaind sense & restraintce to direct referableice. Mainly Reform.
Demonstrated minimum/ poor sense and referableice. Referable reform.
Mainly wickedness.
Sense & referableice referable explaind.
Management
Accounting System
40%
(A), (B) & (C) Exemplary work! Explaind and acutely applied inclusive referableice of question. Comments and.
A compelling discussing. Explaind and
applied
inclusive referableice of question. Comments and.
A convincing discussing. Explaind and applied referableice of question.
A just cogent discussing. Explaind and insufficiently applied referableice of question.
A mainly cogent discussing. Wrote generally environing the question lacked attrrenewal of referableice of the question.
Reasoning otherwise cognate to the question.
Ethical Case
20%
(A), (B) & (C) Exemplary work! Explaind and acutely applied inclusive referableice of question.
A compelling discussing. Explaind and applied
inclusive referableice of question.
A convincing discussing. Explaind and applied referableice of question.
A just cogent discussing. Explaind and insufficiently applied referableice of question.
A mainly cogent discussing. Wrote generally environing the question lacked attrrenewal of referableice of the question.
Reasoning otherwise cognate to the question.
(A) Creative and Critical Thinking
A restraintm of thinking that generates odd and innovative ideas. You eliminate the restraintce to discuss logically, to analyse, to deconstruct, synthesise and evaluate postulates, attrrenewal and discussings and hypothetically beget odd objects
(B) Empowered
Assessment linked to empowered gives you the occasion to direct doctrine to practice; to cogitate not spurious contexts and eliminate and explain apprehensive and technical skills, attitudes and abilities straightly cognate to your room of examine.
(C) Referableiceable
The referableiceable property explains heart hypothetical, pleased and useful elements in a instruction. While past referableiceable explains an sense of the compute of multidisciplinary referableice.
Marks
Available Scrutiny 1: Problem 10.14
Profitforce – ROE 2
Profitforce – ROA 2
Abridgment Comments 2
Gross Margin 2
Net Margin 2
Selling Homogeneity 2
Finance Homogeneity 2
Abridgment Comments 2
Current 2
Quick 2
Abridgment Comments 2
Inventory / Stock 2
Abridgment Comments 1
Accounts Receivable 2
Abridgment Comments 1
Recommendations 5
Limitations 2
Additional Information Demandd 1
References more the citation (x2) 4
Q1 Total 40
Scrutiny 2: Ethics Case
Facts 2
Stakeholders 2
Problem 2
Values & Principles 2
Possible Courses of Renewal 3
Evaluation of Each Renewal 3
Principles & Consequences Raised 2
Choose a Contemplation 2
Justification restraint Selection 1
Identification of Model or Restraintm to Decomposition 1
Referencing Just AASB and APES 5
Q2 Total 25
Scrutiny 3: Problem 12.10
Accounting & Recitaling System 8
Benefits & separation into contemplationning regularity 8
Cost behoof decomposition 8
Who should be concerned in the sketch & eliminatement 5
Is an scrutiny & evaluation of competitors of behoof 6
Q3 Total 35
Task 2 Total 100

Related Post